What is a gated community?
The American Heritage Dictionary defines it this way: "A subdivision or neighborhood, often surrounded by a barrier, to which entry is restricted to residents and their guests."
The Encyclopedia of Chicago definition: "Strictly speaking, a gated community is any residential area which physically restricts the entrance of nonresidents."
Therefore, by definition, the proposed development would be "gated."
What's wrong with a gated community/resort?
- Social and economic segregation: gates, fences and high boundary walls effectively segregate an enclave from the local community and municipality. These so-called Golden Ghettos are designed for the residents to have little or no contact with the community in which they are situated. Combine that with the fact that Miraval Spa clients would pay as much as $8,000 a week for a stay, and it is obvious that the economic disparity between those within the walls and those excluded would be extreme. To make matters worse in this case, the local population would be priced out of an area of inestimable local value.
- A closed enclave runs contrary to the long-established social fabric of our region, one in which families of different income levels live as neighbors in mutual trust. Allowing a gated community with boundless resources and global brand-interests to take root in the heart of Rosendale would erode the neighborly way of life that has been maintained here for many generations. This tradition should be nurtured, not denied.
- Gated Communities foster a unified voting block that has been shown in some cases to alter the political equation in the municipality in which they exist. For example, a wealthy gated enclave - especially a resort/vacation home development - may have no economic or social interest in supporting municipal tax referendums to benefit local schools and infrastructure.
- To quote Professor Setha Low from her article How Private Interests Take Over Public Space: "Private gated communities employ still another set of practices connected with regional and municipal planning. Incorporation, incentive zoning, and succession and annexation recapture public goods and services, including taxpayers' money, and use these goods for the gated community and residents. These strategies are not illegal in the sense that they are not draining the pond or posting no-trespassing signs on land that is not theirs, and do not employ brute force, but they do mislead taxpayers and channel funds into amenities that the public cannot use, and instead contribute to the maintenance of private communities.
- Professor Setha Low again: "Private interests are able to craft complicated deals that benefit the developer and the gated community residents without enhancing public space and at the expense of taxpayers who unwittingly are trading higher-density housing for privatized open spaces and reduced public amenities. Ironically, the taxpayers are subsidizing the creation of a secured residential enclave with private parks, tennis courts, club houses and swimming pools." In this case, the secured enclave would appropriate both Williams Lake and Fourth Lake, with the surrounding wetlands and forest with hiking trails and caves, representing almost 7% of Rosendale Town's total area - and an even greater percentage of Rosendale's open space.
- An outpost of great wealth in Rosendale would surely attempt to influence public policy and dictate to local government on services and taxation. It is naive to think otherwise. For example, rebates on property taxes have been routinely requested by some gated communities against services that the gated enclave pays for privately - like road maintenance within the "fortress". Resolving these annual avoidance tactics places strain upon municipal budgets by introducing unforeseen costs and stress in the form of legal fees and time spent in pursuit of the town's fair share.
- Gating has a number of motivations from equity protection to control of essential services, from fear of strangers to a controlled environment, but foremost among them is a sense of security and protection from crime. Statistics have shown that while the walls and gates might provide some security for the enclave, crime tends to INCREASE in areas adjacent to the compound. (Le Goix)
- Rhetoric aside, HRVR/Canopy/Revolution/Matrix's first concern is profit, and their perspective is corporate and global. Other private investors are going unmentioned, laying low. This is not an optic that favors local, community life - despite assurances of "mindfulness" and sensitivity.
SEE RELATED LINK: Fulbright Scholar Renaud Le Goix Examines Gated Communities in Southern California, UCLA International Institute
SEE RELATED LINK: Putting Up The Gates - by Ed Blakely and Gail Snyder authors of Fortress America: Gated Communities in the United States
RELATED READING: "Behind the Gates - Life, Security, and the Pursuit of Happiness in Fortress America" by Setha Low, Routledge 2003.
RELATED READING: "The Politics of Public Space" edited by Setha Low and Neil Smith. Published in 2006 by Routledge.
We are continuing to research the impact of gates, closure, segregation and exclusivity on local people and economies.
|